It is finally time to examine options for how to
solve the lack of university student voting participation across the nation,
focusing specifically on the students at the University of Michigan. In my previous
blog post, I formulated that the two main causes of poor voting participation
revolve around the process of registering to vote, and the fact that
students are becoming apathetic to politics overall. Finding ways to
counteract these barriers will lead to more effective participation among all
students at the university level.
I met with Joris von Moltke, an active member in
Voice Your Vote (VYV)– an organization within the executive branch of the Central
Student Government focused on registering students to vote and educating
students on the political issues to gain greater appreciation for voting– in
order to get a better feel for what the university is doing to inspire
students to vote. He believes that “the University of Michigan is not doing
enough to get people excited to vote… and that a proactive system should be put
in place by the university to get people to go out and vote.” To contend with
this, VYV is acting to fill the gap left by the university.
Currently, the organization is in talks with
city councilman Zach Ackerman about a possible creation of a city ordinance
requiring all landlords within Ann Arbor to provide tenants with voter
registration forms. This would directly impact students living off campus, who
may deem it too difficult to go out and register on their own time by
presenting them with new ways to start the registration process without leaving
their homes. Also, for those who may not know to where registration forms need be delivered, VYV has installed drop boxes around campus in most
major dorms where students can deposit their completed forms in order to have
them be turned in to the city clerk by a VYV representative.
Turning to the problem of apathy, Joris claims
that it is in relation to misinformation in the general public. Adam Pzreworski
argues that as politics becomes more polarized, people lose interest because
they no longer identify with the views of the prevailing candidates, but this
is missing the point of apathy on the campus level. Joris says, “It’s not
necessarily about choosing the candidate… we are in a system that is based on
voicing your own opinion. You are acting irrational when you do not vote
because you are basically saying that it is alright that you do not have a say,
and that is counterproductive for democracy. You should want to have a say, and
there is no easier way to express that than with voting.” We should look at
voting as an opportunity to voice our own opinions instead of endorsing
candidates with whom our opinions may not coincide, but students are too uninformed
about the issues for this to occur.
The norm for students in the current age is that 'my vote does not matter.' In order to raise participation among college
students, this needs to change; we need to invoke a sense of normality into
active participation and voting. Hanna Pitkin offers a possible solution to
this that could be used to inspire a greater aspect of participation. She proposes
the creation of a system of face-to-face, local, direct democracy in
communities, which can be carried over to attempt to counteract voter apathy by
getting more people involved in politics on campus. This is done on a small scale at the University of Michigan
through the democratic and republican student organizations, but I believe it
can be expanded to include more students, creating a larger impact on voting. Creating
open forums and debates focusing on pertinent issues of the day will allow for students to voice
their opinions and be swayed by those of others. By starting with small,
localized groups we will be able to expand to cover a wide array of interests
that may be lost in national politics, inciting the participation of those
whose opinions often get overshadowed. Helping people see that they can change
small things that do affect them daily can lead to a sense of importance and
value in one’s opinion, and this can be used to counteract apathy.
By reducing apathy
while also providing students with more opportunities to register to vote, we
could possibly see an increase in voter participation among the
college-aged electorate. Making sure everyone has the ability to register to vote by making it known how easy the process is, and then creating more options and discussion around campus for students to learn about why they truly should be voting will lead to greater participation in the long run. Coming together to understand that our voice and our
opinions matter is key to make sure the student generation of voters no longer
remains silent.
Pitkin,
Hanna Fenichel. Representation and
Democracy: Uneasy Alliance. Nordic Political Science Association. 2004.
Pzreworski,
Adam. Self-Government in our Times. Annual
Reviews. 2009.
Voice
Your Vote. csg.umich.edu. UM Central
Student Government. 2014. web.
https://csg.umich.edu/executive-branch/commissions/voice-your-vote
Very interesting read. Have you considered the option of expanding the number of ways to vote in order to encourage more young people to vote? By this I mean allow voting online, by mail, or hold an early voting period for those who cannot vote on the normal election day. Just a thought.
ReplyDeleteThe main goal that Voice your Vote is going for is to get more people registered for primary and general elections. The voting itself has to be done on the specific election day as subject to Michigan laws outside of absentee balloting. Many states are incorporating an online registration process which could be used to make it easier for registering, but this would need to be considered at the state level, not just through Michigan Student Government. Thank you for your comments!
ReplyDelete