In
my last post I touched on how in a democracy, it is not an okay practice to
ignore the wants of the people. This in no way should be part of a democratic
form of government. Similarly, in the Social
Contract by Jean Jacques Rousseau, he says that the sovereign (the people
collectively) are suppose to legislate, and that they are supposed to legislate
according to the general will. Not the will of one man which is exactly what happened
in Flint. While this dated version of democracy does not correlate exactly with
our current representative democracy, we still appointed a group of official to
be in charge, and those wants were completely ignored by the state government.
Also touched
on in my last post, this failure to practice democracy was allowed by an
emergency manager law that can shift power from a group of publicly elected
officials to someone who may not even be from the city that Is being affected.
According to tripplepundit.com
an emergency manager can: Hire/fire
local government employees, renegotiate, terminate, modify labor contracts with
state treasury approval, sell, lease, or privatize local assets with state
treasury approval, revise contract obligations, change local budgets without
local legislative approval, initiate municipal bankruptcy proceedings, and hire
support staff. By appointing a person to take care of these task, Snyder
successfully ignored the “general will”, and this have left a large number of
flint citizens wanting his job. But can you blame them?
Clearly Michigan doesn’t have a dictatorship, but every time this EM law
is put into affect then in my opinion they are taking on simple characteristics
of a dictatorship. Shifting power into the hand of one man is not something
that needs to be done.
As a result, I have one simple solution to fix this obvious failure in
democracy seen in Flint Michigan. Remove the emergency manager law. This is
something that needs to be done. Every time this law is used it is a failure in
democracy. This failure is almost as big as overturning the voter referendum
which was also done by Snyder which was made in efforts to stop the switching
of the Flint water source. Overall it is clearly seen that the government
allows for a official of the government to over extend his powers and cause a
lapse in democracy. The only way to stop this completely is to remove laws that
allow this abuse of power to stop. Power should be in the hands of the people.
At this point there is already not that much power in the hands of the common
person because our current form of representative government. By overlooking
the wants of the people and also removing elected official from office is
something that must not be allowed to happen. In my opinion the people have
spoken and it is now time to act. There should not be room to further overlook
the “general will” in the future.
In my next blog, I will talk about solutions to the problem, and in my
opinion what can be done to prevent failures in democracy, like this one, from
happening again. I also will be interviewing someone who has worked closely
with people in the Flint.
Works Cited
Newell, Andrea. "How
Michigan’s Elimination of Democracy Poisoned a
City."
Tripplepundit.com. Tripplepundit, 5 Feb. 2016. Web. 3 Apr. 2016.
Rousseau, Jean Jacques. Social
Contract & Discourses. New York: E. P.
Dutton
& Co., 1913; Bartleby.com, 2010. www.bartleby.com/168/.
[Date of Printout].
Just a heads up, I think this could you a Lot of editing and rewording (spelling, grammar, and even graphical errors are ruining the blog). I do agree with you on the whole general will issue but hasn't appointing people been appropriated by social contracts? I believe the solution you propose could be developed much more in that America as of now is not a full democracy and such extensive democracy cannot come about any time sooner. Though yes, because we have this appointment system, we often get inept officials in charge -but having them be well-equipped for the job is outside the people's control. If anything, the public body-politic must bring forth a good candidate to Snyder and/or those with deliberative power. While I am with you on your advocacy for democracy, I found that this blog is too cluttered with needless details and editing mistakes that it takes away from the point. Many of the paragraphs could be shortened and the main point you make shouldn't be repeated over and over -I knew exactly where you were going with this by the first paragraph and made the other following ones seem tedious. I sincerely hope that you can appeal to edit this blog because, it really needs it: from silly spelling errors to major grammatical issues (don't forget the blank images!) -I couldn't take it seriously especially with word choice and phrasing errors...please do not be offended, I just wanted to bring this into light so you have a chance to correct this blog since it brought nothing new to the discussion of your topic from your first blog (which was MUCH better in my opinion and showed great promise). I'm taken back that this series took a huge dip right here with this "filler" blog that talks about one point over and over when it was already made in the first one. Another heads up for your first blog this time, the image is not working and there are very outstanding spelling and word choice errors that take away from this series. I was drawn in by your personal interview with your roommate from the first blog to see what could be done about Flint, Michigan...I hope the last blog will live up to the potential this series had, and I sincerely apologize for being so blunt about so many things. My only wish is that this holds up to the standards everyone is facing with this project -Gods bless you for choosing a very current and controversial topic!
ReplyDelete